Latest News Topical

Whirlpool plays dirty on washing machine refund saga

Appliances giant faces criticism for washing machine recall delays

Whirlpool, the white goods giant whose brands include Hotpoint and Indesit, has at last announced its plans for a partial recall of its faulty washing machines.

On 17 December 2019 it announced a recall of certain models of washing machines manufactured between 2014 and 2018. Advice to customers was to unplug the affected machines because of the possible risk of fire. This left affected customers without a washing machine over the Christmas period while the company appeared to do nothing to help customers or offer any compensation.

The fault – and associated recall – relates to the electronic locking system on 519,000 machines which were sold since 2014, which can cause them to overheat and catch fire. 79 fires have so far been caused by this electronic design failure.

Whirlpool has said that the 60,000 people so far found to be affected will receive an email by Friday 10 January 2019 inviting them to choose between a replacement and a repair. However, Whirlpool has still refused to offer refunds, partial or otherwise, to those affected. This is despite calls by consumer champions, such as Which?

Which? calls for refunds

Sue Davies, head of consumer protection at consumer group Which?, said:

“It would clearly be unacceptable if customers were left for many months without adequate washing facilities in their homes, particularly when there is also no offer to cover consequential costs such as trips to the laundrette.

The company should do the right thing and offer customers a refund, so people can get fire-risk machines out of their homes and quickly find a suitable replacement. There needs to be a full investigation about what Whirlpool knew about these machines and when.”

I obviously agree! It is disgusting that Whirlpool should continue to treat customers in this way. Why did it wait for 79 fires to occur before it took action? Why hasn’t it learnt any lessons from its own tumble dryer fiasco?

Slow to act

It has been 26 days since Whirlpool announced the recall and it is only now that it has started to notify customers regarding dates for replacement and/or repairs. Even as of late afternoon 9 January 2019 it still didn’t appear to have contacted all vulnerable customers. How long people will have to wait after receiving this email is not clear either.

The Hotpoint Twitter feed shows that the company has been slow to act. Even where a customer is vulnerable. For example:

BBC report

A BBC News report by Kevin Peachey on 9 January says:

“One of those affected by the recall is Janet McPherson, of Lampeter, South West Wales. The 65-year-old was fed up with the probability of a long wait, had lost trust in the brand, faced an eight-mile round trip to the laundrette, and was frustrated with Whirlpool’s customer service.

I made my vote by buying a different brand. It did not help with the Christmas budget at all,” she said.”

She wants a refund and is now ready for what could be a long fight with the company. I completely agree with Janet, of course Whirlpool customers should be given refunds.

Both my washing machine and dishwasher are on their last legs, I can assure you I won’t touch anything to do with Whirlpool, whose brands in the UK include Hotpoint and Indesit.

If I had an affected machine I would happily go through the Small Claims Court to get the necessary refund. I encourage and will support my readers to do the same. 

Your rights under The Consumer Protection Act 1987

This Act (a European directive) prohibits the manufacture and supply of unsafe goods, making the manufacturer or seller of a defective product responsible for any damage it causes. The Act states where a manufacturer has made a defective product which has caused a personal injury or damage to your property, it, not the trader is responsible. The value of the damage must be more than £275.

So you can claim for this as well if you have had a fire. However, I would recommend seeking legal advice from a solicitor before embarking on this.

For more details about the situation and what you can do, please see my previous article The Whirlpool washing machine whitewash

Take it to the top and persevere

If you’re having problems getting the necessary replacement or repair please click here to find the contact details for the Whirlpool UK CEO.

I heard on the BBC Radio 2 News today a customer had fought to get a refund on a Whirlpool appliance. She was threatened with the legal team but she kept on and won through in the end so don’t give up!

The future for Whirlpool

I fail to understand how Whirlpool thinks treating customers like this is acceptable. Why isn’t it doing what it can to ensure customers are treated fairly? How much longer can a company continue like this?

Many customers are losing faith in brand and many potential customers are too. Would you buy an appliance from a company that appears to continue to treat customers so unfairly?

Template letter to adapt

If you have an affected appliance, you could use this template and adapt as necessary. If you do not know the exact date give as much information as possible.

Please fill in the gaps then send the letter by email to the Whirlpool UK CEO.


On the (date, including year) I purchased a (fill in manufacturer name and model number) washing machine.

I am rejecting your offer of a repair or replacement. This is because I have lost faith in your company to put matters right or provide another like-for-like machine that is safe.

I expect therefore a full refund of the price paid for the faulty machine.

Under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 or the Sale and Supply of Goods Act 1994 (delete the Act which does not apply*) In addition I am legally entitled to out of pocket expenses. Due to being without a washing machine I have incurred the following expenses and attach evidence for:

(list what is applicable the below are examples)

Launderette cost so far £
Travel expenses cost so far £

These costs will continue to accumulate until the matter is resolved and I will expect full reimbursement of all costs incurred.

Should I not be fully satisfied with your response, I will not hesitate in taking the matter further and this will include but not be limited to taking the matter through the Small Claims Court.

Yours sincerely


* Consumer Rights Act 2015 for purchases made on or after 1 October 2015 and the Sale and Supply of Goods Act 1994 for purchases before then.



Complaining about faulty goods Latest News Press releases

Whirlpool/Hotpoint/Indesit shows contempt for tumble dryer customers

Press release

Dryer replacement scheme ends for Whirlpool/Hotpoint/Indesit users – Company updates list of affected machines without telling customers

Whirlpool has announced that it is ending its replacement scheme for dangerous tumble dryers that have caused fires.

With growing waiting lists for repairs, Whirlpool had previously offered customers the option of purchasing a new dryer at the reduced rate of £50. Customers had been given the option of a vented dryer priced at £59 (RRP £219) or a condenser dryer priced at £99 (RRP £299).

This latest move has angered consumer groups and the chair of the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy committee, Rachel Reeves, who has demanded to know why Whirlpool is ending its replacement scheme for dangerous tumble dryers.

A growing list of affected machines

Whilst Whirlpool continues to make customers wait for repairs, Helen Dewdney – The Complaining Cow consumer expert and author of How to Complain – has discovered that customers have found that they own machines they were initially told were not affected.

Whirlpool customer, Juliet Govey, saw the announcements in the media regarding the defective tumble dryers and checked the list. Her model was not listed. In 2017, when she needed a repair on her machine and called out a Hotpoint engineer, he realised the machine was on recall and made the necessary modifications on the spot. She says “His view was that we may well have been safe as we kept the filter, condenser and casing clean and as fluff free as possible. There was very little fluff behind the drum when it was dismantled. I think we were just lucky.”

On my post regarding what to do if you have an affected dryer, Jess commented that she had bought a Hotpoint dryer in early 2015. Late in the year the announcements were made about the hazards and she was advised to go online and check if affected and was told it was too new for the problems and was not one of the models. On renewing her house insurance this year she told them it was a safe one. A few weeks ago she smelt burning from the dryer and immediately unplugged it and pulled it out and called out a repair man. He said it needed a new belt which would be about £10. She asked him to fit it but when he checked the model he refused, saying he wouldn’t work on a ‘fire hazard’. Jess checked online again, and found that the machine had been added to the list. On contacting Hotpoint she was told that the list had been updated.

Check online to be sure

I’m urging anyone who bought their machine and was told that their machine was safe to check again online on the Indesit and Hotpoint safety sites (Creda owners can check via the Hotpoint site) to see if their machine has now been added. “It is shocking and reprehensible that Whirlpool seems to have such a poor regard for safety. Why haven’t they kept records of people who have contacted them and done more (or anything!) to raise awareness that models have been added to the list? This in conjunction with all the other evidence against them regarding their slapdash attitude beggars belief.”

Coroner’s report

This latest revelation follows on from the coroner’s report, published on 31 October 2017 into the deaths of Bernard Hender, 19, and Doug McTavish, 39, who died in a flat in Llanrwst, Conwy county, in October 2014. The coroner, David Lewis, said that the fire was caused “on the balance of probabilities” by an electrical fault with the door switch on the dryer. Describing the evidence presented at the inquest by Whirlpool as “defensive and dismissive” he stated the company’s approach was an “obstacle” to finding steps to prevent future fires. He called on the company to take action to prevent future fires. Whirlpool has until 26 December 2017 to respond.

Fire Whirlpool The tumble dryer story without the spin


Whirlpool – The tumble dryer story without the spin